My week started on a grand note: Being mildly ticked off by Conrad.
According to him there is “an art to disagree without being disagreeable”. I am sure there is. And, by implication, I should work on it. Why would I? There is more important art to work on. I am happy with the person I am. Let me remind you: Wisdom goes that HOW something is received is not just down to the SENDER, it is very much down to the RECIPIENT. So maybe you want to retune. Looney certainly is on the right wavelength, as was Magpie till he turned off the wireless.
Please don’t just skim that last paragraph. Read it. Think about it.
Divine intervention: Last night I wrote a post some might think scathing (it was, even I squeaked in my boots ). It focussed on MAYOnnaise and stupidity (the two not connected) - the latter encountered ca 2231 hrs Sunday night. Was terribly pleased with myself to kick the semi comatose back into shape (not in real life – only on this blog) to find that I couldn’t send. I tried THREE times. After receiving good old Con’s remark this morning (his stock value on the Ursula index having fallen considerably – but don’t sell yet) I thanked my lucky stars. If that post had gone out I’d be dead now, as dead as one can find oneself in the virtuous world of the virtual.
You don’t know what you have missed. Might still post it – don’t egg me on, BHB. With Looney’s spiritual guidance, see my PS below, I might return as one down from his barnacle. Or, more likely, Superwoman Brute 2. Looney’s stock rising. No bear.
Must get grip since my personal brand of humoUr not to be wasted on the uncomprehending.
Following in Jean’s questioning footsteps, and I believe she has created a most useful way for communicating, here is MY question: Has divine intervention ever played a role in your life?
U
PS Looney educating me in his reply – apropos of reincarnation – as to the ways of the world was as follows: And his take is so divine have now included him (that’s you, Looney) in my inner circle of people dear to me – those who understand how the way of the world and its behind work:
He wrote, and you, Conrad, will concede that Looney has overtaken you and stepped, effortlessly, into masterclass of the art you are still pursuing:
According to Plato in Timaeus, you really were a man in a previous life:
“He who lived well during his appointed time was to return and dwell in his native star, and there he would have a blessed and congenial existence. But if he failed in attaining this, at the second birth he would pass into a woman, and if, when in that state of being, he did not desist from evil, he would continually be changed into some brute who resembled him in the evil nature which he had acquired …”
In this dialog, even Socrates could not find anything to object to in this statement, so I am unqualified to refute it.”
It’s brilliant. No. Make that divine.
PPS (for the uneducated: ’PPS is a second post scriptum) Forget voices, forget everything. Give me a man who knows his Plato and – more importantly – how to quote him at the right time in the right context and I am a goner.